P You are probably right about it being unlikely that humans will voluntarily phase ourselves out.
P Yeah, some people thought the human body would fly apart when we reached the speed of sound.P You might ask Dan if this level of thought indicates hope for the human race.P Its hard to not get mad sometimes, especially when denial becomes too thin mujer mayor busca joven tijuana to cover the obvious.Well, this is a bunch of bullshit, since no other animal besides us has the intelligence to miss anything.Drew writes: I think that a more humanitarian view would be that of humans being a part of the ecosystem.Congrats Les, I feel that you have totally outsmarted the writer of comments such as you are a silly little man and whilst I still disagree with the idea I am much more in your favouryouve somewhat opened my mind LEs.2) Which brings us to another reason: the world we would be sentencing a loved one to life in isnt all that great.
P Those things only have value to humanity.
Those 2,000 year old redwoods Maxxam is liquidating will grow back in time.
P Yes, when one averages out the six billion humans with the immenseness of time and space, we round off to zero.or B) That even if the number of species on this planet is decreasing it is because of us humans /P Even if the scientific community didnt agree on this, I think its obvious when we look around that wildlife habitat has largely been converted.It seems to me that survival of the fittest has become a justification of irresponsibility rather than a basic premise of evolutionary theory.TO preserve the earth Human attitude must change as well.P You might have me confused with someone else: my name is Les, not Nimrod.If nature is infallible, and man evolved as a part of nature, then you must conclude that mankind and whatever mankind does is exactly what nature wants, and your angst about what you see as the destruction of nature is misplaced.P As I understand it, theres tons of space on the internet.